[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1Jp2pD-00043W-IF@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:53:27 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
ezk@...sunysb.edu, mhalcrow@...ibm.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] vfs: add helpers to check r/o bind mounts
> > > RTFS. permission() doesn't do "is that vfsmount read-only" checks, exactly
> > > because it's 100% bogus - either you cover it with entire area where we
> > > are guaranteed to stay r/w, or it's by definition racy.
> >
> > I know that.
> >
> > That does not mean, that fh_verify() needs to do vfsmount r/o checks.
> > AFAICS it's perfectly OK to do that later, around the vfs_ call.
>
> ... and around everything else that happens to be done after fh_verify
> for write access, surely?
What in particular? You have managed to avoid answering this question
for the last...I don't know how many emails.
> Note that e.g. nfsd_setattr() does _not_ call
> vfs_<anything>()...
Yes it does: notify_change(). It's vfs_setattr() under a pseudonym.
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists