[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080424.090008.232544945.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Cc: jakub@...hat.com, drepper@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alternative to sys_indirect, part 1
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:24:44 +0100
> BTW in 4.4BSD and derivatives if I remember rightly F_CLOEXEC *is*
> inherited across accept() so I doubt any user space software will be too
> upset by such a shift.
It actually doesn't.
Just like in Linux, no file descriptor flags are inherited.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists