[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804241715320.7642@axis700.grange>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:03:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
cc: Gerhard Pircher <gerhard_pircher@....net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, adaplas@...il.com,
linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [2.6.25-rc6] possible regression: X server dying
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hm, so looks like I'm not seeing some ghosts on mine either. 2.6.25-rc8
> xorg runs under etch, but enters a tight (no syscalls) loop woth 100% CPU
> load under lenny. A 2.6.24 based kernel works under both etch and lenny...
> Haven't had time to try to localize the problem. Glint xorg driver, DRM
> and AGP are off, CONFIG_FB_PM2=y.
Ok, here's more info. It DOES seem to be a regression. I spent half a day
yesterday trying to trace this down, with no success. Multiple bisect
attempts ended up with non-bootable kernels on the very first iteration.
Today I just wanted to post all possible logs / configs to Bugzilla and -
it "suddenly" worked... And the change that made it work was - I disabled
CONFIG_FB_PM2 in the kernel...
So, I think, this shall be qualified as a regression, although, I have no
idea where. pm2fb.c itself hasn't (effectively for little endian) changed
since 2.6.24. To make it visual
etch lenny
v2.6.24 works works
v2.6.25 works fails
/me thinks he should trade his ap400 to the Linux Kernel Testers Inc. for
LOTS of money.
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists