[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4810AF9F.5040705@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:04:47 -0700
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alternative to sys_indirect, part 1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alan Cox wrote:
> Believe it or not we have the compute capability between us to not
> accidentally reassign values we assigned to one thing to something else.
Once again, this is not about assigned values. This is about the time
before you get a value assigned. Not every experiment out there will
have a value assigned before it starts development.
But it really doesn't matter to me. I'm not the one you would introduce
the problem. Patch is forthcoming.
>> Oh really? You open a server socket, use fcntl(FD_CLOEXEC), and then
>> accept().
>
> And your behaviour just became OS specific....
Not according to POSIX. If some OSes deliberately violate POSIX that's
their problem. All POSIX OSes will have up to today return a new file
descriptor without the close-on-exec flag set at all times. Just read
the spec.
- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIEK+f2ijCOnn/RHQRAtYRAJ9Ve9XSkMriqkHkiCL00wsXzJJbYgCgmqzQ
3uexpcjM0NvU7qgngOs7LDA=
=uNKi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists