linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] alternative to sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080424163835.55520b5b@the-village.bc.nu>
Date:	Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:38:35 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	jakub@...hat.com, drepper@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alternative to sys_indirect, part 1

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:24:44 +0100
> 
> > BTW in 4.4BSD and derivatives if I remember rightly F_CLOEXEC *is*
> > inherited across accept() so I doubt any user space software will be too
> > upset by such a shift.
> 
> It actually doesn't.
> 
> Just like in Linux, no file descriptor flags are inherited.

NDELAY certainly appears to be looking at Stevens.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/