linux-kernel - should NAMESPACES really depend on EMBEDDED?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804241845550.18021@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:48:16 -0400 (EDT)
From:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: should NAMESPACES really depend on EMBEDDED?

  i realize that namespaces represent a feature that could be omitted
for reasons of space, but is it really necessary to make that feature
actually depend on EMBEDDED?  the aesthetics of things depending on
EMBEDDED are already getting a bit grotesque, what with menu entries
magically appearing out of nowhere when you select that feature.  it
would make life easier (and prettier) if that dependency could be
dropped in a few places that aren't critical.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
    Have classroom, will lecture.

http://crashcourse.ca                          Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/