lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:13:03 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [git pull] scheduler/misc fixes

On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 00:57 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:48:30 +0200
> 
> >  c) there are 'IPI' handlers on SPARC64 that look like they can wake
> >     the CPU from idle sleep but do not appear to call irq_enter() which
> >     has the above patch's touch_softlock_watchdog() in its callchain.
> > 
> > tl0_irq1:       TRAP_IRQ(smp_call_function_client, 1)
> > tl0_irq2:       TRAP_IRQ(smp_receive_signal_client, 2)
> > tl0_irq3:       TRAP_IRQ(smp_penguin_jailcell, 3)
> > tl0_irq4:       TRAP_IRQ(smp_new_mmu_context_version_client, 4)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > So the current working thesis is that the bug in a) hides a real problem
> > not quite fixed by b) and exploited by c).
> 
> The equivalent to smp_receive_signal_client() on x86
> (smp_reschedule_interrupt) doesn't do an irq_enter() either.
> 
> However x86 does do an irq_enter() for smp_call_function() interrupt
> handling.
> 
> What is the rule in these cases?
> 
> Anyways, does the following patch fix the problem?

Sadly, no :-(

> diff --git a/arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c
> index 524b889..bf4ef84 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -866,14 +866,21 @@ void smp_call_function_client(int irq, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	void *info = call_data->info;
>  
>  	clear_softint(1 << irq);
> +
> +	irq_enter();
> +
> +	if (!call_data->wait) {
> +		/* let initiator proceed after getting data */
> +		atomic_inc(&call_data->finished);
> +	}
> +
> +	func(info);
> +
> +	irq_exit();
> +
>  	if (call_data->wait) {
>  		/* let initiator proceed only after completion */
> -		func(info);
> -		atomic_inc(&call_data->finished);
> -	} else {
> -		/* let initiator proceed after getting data */
>  		atomic_inc(&call_data->finished);
> -		func(info);
>  	}
>  }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ