linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched: add statics, don't return void expressions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1209125826.24931.12.camel@lappy>
Date:	Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:17:06 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: add statics, don't return void expressions

On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 18:17 -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> Noticed by sparse:
> kernel/sched.c:760:20: warning: symbol 'sched_feat_names' was not declared. Should it be static?
> kernel/sched.c:767:5: warning: symbol 'sched_feat_open' was not declared. Should it be static?
> kernel/sched_fair.c:845:3: warning: returning void-valued expression
> kernel/sched.c:4386:3: warning: returning void-valued expression

I'm still of two minds about that latter warning, I think:

void foo(void);

void bar(void)
{
	return foo();
}

isn't wrong, as the return types match.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/