linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] idle (arch, acpi and apm) and lockdep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1209147590.1956.12.camel@lappy>
Date:	Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:19:50 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Justin Mattock <justinmattock@...il.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] idle (arch, acpi and apm) and lockdep

On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 18:08 +0000, Justin Mattock wrote:
> O.K. I applied this patch, below are the results:

> patching file arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 111.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 126.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 183.
> Hunk #4 FAILED at 194.
> 4 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c.rej
> patching file arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 106.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 179.
> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c.rej
> patching file drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 418.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 519.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 535.
> 3 out of 3 FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c.rej
> pathing file arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 904.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 912.
> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c.rej
> patching file include/asm/asm-x86/processor.h
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 723.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILE -- saving rejects to file include/asm-x86/processor.h.rej
> patching file arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 44 with fuzz 2.
> 
> When I compile the kernel I'm receiving this.
> 
> arch/x86/kernel/process.o: In function `select_idle_routine':
> process.c:(.cpuinit.text+0x0): multiple definition of `select_idle_routine'
> arch/x86/kernel/process_32.o:process_32.c(.cpuinit.text+0x0: first defined here
> arch/x86/kernel/process.o: In function `cpu_idle_wait':
> process.c:(text+0x16): multiple definition of `cpu_idle_wait'
> arch/x86/kernel/process_32.o:process_32.c:(.text0x432): first defined here
> arch/x86/kernel/process.o: In function `mwait_idle_with_hints':
> process.c:(.text+0x113): multiple definition of 'mwait_idle_with_hints'
> arch/x86/kernel/process_32.o:process_32.c:(.text+0x1db): first defined here
> make[1]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o] Error 1
> make: *** [arch/x86/kernel] Error 2
> 
> 
> Should I just go ahead and try git-pull to see if these patches are
> applied over there correctly.
> regards;

That's no good :-/

weird, I have:

# git describe
v2.6.25-4569-gb69d398

# quilt push
Applying patch patches/idle-lockdep-1.patch
patching file arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
patching file arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
patching file drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
patching file arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c
patching file include/asm-x86/processor.h
patching file arch/x86/kernel/process.c

Now at patch patches/idle-lockdep-1.patch


And I did a i386 and x86_64 defconfig build before I send it out.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/