[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080425185350.GA2679@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:53:50 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, zdenek.kabelac@...il.com,
rjw@...k.pl, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
penberg@...helsinki.fi, clameter@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, pageexec@...email.hu,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: fix text_poke
On Fri 2008-04-25 08:57:20, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> text_poke() itself only applies/unapplies the LOCK prefix - a single byte.
>> We shouldnt be doing that at all: the cost of LOCK is insignificant (a few
>> cycles) and most systems are SMP anyway.
>>
>
> Alas, on older CPUs the cost of LOCK can be massive. The question is how
> much we really care - the embedded people (who would definitely be
> affected) will simply build UP kernels, and this only affects booting SMP
> kernels on UP.
Like... say distros on older hardware?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists