linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.25-mm1 (snd-pcsp doesn't like DEBUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4811555E.3040509@aknet.ru>
Date:	Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:51:58 +0400
From:	Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru>
To:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1 (snd-pcsp doesn't like DEBUG_PAGEALLOC)

Hello.

Takashi Iwai wrote:
> No, I don't think input-pcspkr would be ever easily obsoleted by
> snd-pcsp.  People definitely want a system without the sound subsystem
> but with a beep.
If you don't enable sound, then you
can't enable snd-pcsp, and so the
pcspkr can be enabled.
But if you have enabled the sound,
what's the use in not seeing the
snd-pcsp in the config?
Because most people already had
pcspkr enabled I guess, this just
reduces the availability of snd-pcsp
by an order of magnitude. And the
reason for that, is... ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/