lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:51:51 +0200 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>, Dmitry <dbaryshkov@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, pHilipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>, tony@...mide.com, David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>, hiroshi.DOYU@...ia.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Clocklib: generic clocks framework Hi! > > WTF? There are currently around 10 copies of clock code in the tree, > > every one slightly different. If this can help us get rid of all that > > crap, that's a GOOD THING, normative or not. > > At the expense of people going off and inventing their own APIs because > they find that the "normatived" clock API doesn't do what they need to? Just now, everyone just cuts&copies clock.c. I do not think "new" situation can worse than that. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists