[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1FE6DD409037234FAB833C420AA843EC012F9F55@orsmsx424.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:25:06 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>, "Mike Travis" <travis@....com>,
"Russ Anderson" <rja@....com>
Subject: RE: [git pull] ia64 changes
>> Build fix for CONFIG_NUMA=y && CONFIG_SMP=n
>>...
>
> Why is this an allowed configuration on ia64?
It shows up in allnoconfig ... probably because some
bit of Kconfig forces NUMA=y.
I can't imagine that it is ever a useful combination ... except to
find places in the code where people have:
#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
...
#else
#if defined(CONFIG_NUMA) // !!! SMP=n, NUMA code???
...
#endif
#endif
Which is what happened, and is being fixed, here.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists