[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19f34abd0804261055u49d3951fn7e6d0a87e65254c2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 19:55:28 +0200
From: "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To: "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: "Sam Ravnborg" <sam@...nborg.org>,
"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] headerdep: a tool for detecting inclusion cycles in header file
On 4/26/08, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 06:57:09PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> > On 4/26/08, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > And you need cross compilers for all architectures since fiddling with
> > > #include's under include/ breaks code left and right that only compiled
> > > due to some implicit #include (and if it still works due to another
> > > implicit #include on x86 the latter might not be present on all
> > > architectures).
> >
> > Yep. I have been compiling cross-compilers myself. As a btw, I had
> > already started some project to distribute binary cross-compilers
> > http://folk.uio.no/vegardno/crosstool/ for the purpose of making
> > cross-compiling easier to get started with. (It would be cool to have
> > a complete suite of working cross-compilers in a single download.)
>
>
> "The source code for the binary files below can be downloaded from the
> aforementioned project websites."
>
> -> GPL violation
Thanks, corrected.
Vegard
--
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists