[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1209237655.14173.29.camel@brick>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:20:55 -0700
From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: If you want me to quit I will quit
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 14:00 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > [BUILDFIX PATCH] au0828: debug is a poor global identifier
>
> Another issue for which I already sent a (slightly different) patch.
>
> Why not check the mailing list before duplicating work? [1]
>
I do generally try to check the mailing list to avoid this...but LKML
tends to be pretty busy. I also try to check the latest -git devel
tree for the affected area in case it's waiting to be pulled. In this
case it was so trivial I sent it directly to Linus.
In fact, I concentrate on looking at the sparse output because you
do such a good job of catching unnecessary exports/globals.
> And if you e.g. discover next that our x86 userspace headers in
> 2.6.25 (sic) are fucked up guess who already sent a patch last
> weekend... [2]
>
> Why do other people get over 100 checkpatch fixes into the tree at once
> or Linus applies patches directly bypassing the maintainers (like the
> one you sent just before [3], which I've also already sent before [4])
> but my patches bitrot forever?
And look how many of mine have been sitting in -mm for weeks because I
thought they should go through a maintainer/-mm. This was just annoying
as it was making my sparse builds quit, and I thought others might be in
the same boat.
Cheers,
Harvey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists