| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <48139554.7030603@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 22:49:24 +0200 From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: If you want me to quit I will quit Andrew Morton wrote: > Often it takes quite a long time for problems to become apparent. Across a > month or two we end up with things like: [...] > that's two patches, each with three followon fixes. Very common. > > Fact is, this is the way in which developers want to work. That is their > workflow, and their tools should follow their workflow. If a tool's > behaviour prevents them from implementing their desired workflow, it isn't > the workflow which should be changed ;) Well, some of the questions here, notably - when to fold patch + amendment patch into a single patch - when to publish things to whom are actually about the workflow, not about the tool. (And it's good to learn of other people's expectations about it.) -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- -=-- ==-=- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists