[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200804262333.39383.bpidoux@free.fr>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 23:33:39 +0200
From: Bernard Pidoux <bpidoux@...e.fr>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Bernard Pidoux <bpidoux@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: spinlock lockup on CPU#0
Hi,
I observed about the same message but after the line
Brought up 2 CPUs in dmesg.
However the system keeps running fine.
I run a Core2 Duo processor.
dmesg dump is attached.
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2662 check_flags+0x18d/0x190()
Modules linked in:
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.25 #2
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8022fbff>] warn_on_slowpath+0x5f/0x80
[<ffffffff80213a77>] ? native_sched_clock+0x57/0x80
[<ffffffff8022ac1a>] ? hrtick_set+0x3a/0x120
[<ffffffff80254da5>] ? __lock_acquire+0x245/0x1070
[<ffffffff8022ac9d>] ? hrtick_set+0xbd/0x120
[<ffffffff80213a77>] ? native_sched_clock+0x57/0x80
[<ffffffff8024b0b0>] ? __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x0/0xa0
[<ffffffff8025180d>] check_flags+0x18d/0x190
[<ffffffff80255c33>] lock_acquire+0x63/0xd0
[<ffffffff8024b101>] __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x51/0xa0
[<ffffffff8020b210>] ? mwait_idle+0x0/0x50
[<ffffffff8020b0a0>] ? default_idle+0x0/0x80
[<ffffffff8024b161>] atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x11/0x20
[<ffffffff8020a849>] __exit_idle+0x29/0x30
[<ffffffff8020b178>] cpu_idle+0x58/0xa0
[<ffffffff80450b5e>] start_secondary+0x2fe/0x430
---[ end trace ca143223eefdc828 ]---
possible reason: unannotated irqs-on.
irq event stamp: 12
Bernard Pidoux
View attachment "dmesg_swapper_Not_tainted_2.6.25" of type "text/plain" (26640 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists