[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0804261540310.6108@twinlark.arctic.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: dean gaudet <dean@...tic.org>
To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jakub@...hat.com,
drepper@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alternative to sys_indirect, part 1
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> A while back I did some testing of this point. These were the results I noted:
>
> FreeBSD 4.8
> O_NONBLOCK and O_ASYNC are inherited
> FD_CLOEXEC is not inherited
>
> Solaris 8
> O_NONBLOCK and O_ASYNC are inherited
> FD_CLOEXEC is not inherited
>
> Tru64 5.1 (sep 03, testdrive)
> No F_SETFL flags are inherited
> FD_CLOEXEC is not inherited
>
> HP-UX 11
> No F_SETFL flags are inherited
> FD_CLOEXEC is not inherited
invent FD_CLOEXEC_INHERITED to handle accept()?
-dean
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists