[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200804270105.18096.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 01:05:17 +0200
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@....com>, xfs@....sgi.com,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc()
On Saturday 26 April 2008 20:54, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > This patch reduces xfs_bmap_btalloc() stack usage by 50 bytes
> > by moving part of its body into a helper function.
> >
> > This results in some variables not taking stack space in
> > xfs_bmap_btalloc() anymore.
> >
> > The helper itself does not call anything stack-deep.
> > Stack-deep call to xfs_alloc_vextent() happen
> > in xfs_bmap_btalloc(), as before.
> >
> > Compile tested only.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
>
> Looks like a very good approach, it pushes a lot of large local vars off
> into the helper.
>
> There is one build-time problem if DEBUG is turned on:
>
> if (args.fsbno != NULLFSBLOCK) {
> ap->firstblock = ap->rval = args.fsbno;
> ASSERT(nullfb || fb_agno == args.agno ||
> (ap->low && fb_agno < args.agno));
>
> in xfs_bmap_btalloc, which no longer has an fb_agno variable which the
> ASSERT macro uses.
Do you want me to rework and resend the patch?
--
vda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists