linux-kernel - Re: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080427.022130.193697611.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 27 Apr 2008 02:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	airlied@...il.com
Cc:	steve@...acs.org, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING

From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:16:31 +1000

> just because something lands in the core kernel tree doesn't mean it
> is actually perfect, far from it..

This is entirely missing the point.

We get patches reviewed before they hit the tree, not afterwards.

Ingo is making that impossible.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/