lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6.1.1.1.2.20080427141058.045c43f0@192.168.6.12>
Date:	Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:25:16 +0200
From:	Roger While <simrw@...-basis.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mcgrof@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] prism54: prism54_get_encode() test below 0 on
  unsigned index

Luis Rodriguez wrote :

>The check for -1 seems silly lets just remove its use.
>
>Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@...eros.com>
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/prism54/isl_ioctl.c 
>b/drivers/net/wireless/prism54/isl_ioctl.c
>index 5b375b2..7e2d3b6 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/wireless/prism54/isl_ioctl.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/prism54/isl_ioctl.c
>@@ -1158,7 +1158,7 @@ prism54_get_encode(struct net_device *ndev, struct 
>iw_request_info *info,
>  {
>         islpci_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
>         struct obj_key *key;
>-       u32 devindex, index = (dwrq->flags & IW_ENCODE_INDEX) - 1;
>+       u32 devindex, index = (dwrq->flags & IW_ENCODE_INDEX);
>         u32 authen = 0, invoke = 0, exunencrypt = 0;
>         int rvalue;
>         union oid_res_t r;
>@@ -1186,7 +1186,7 @@ prism54_get_encode(struct net_device *ndev, struct 
>iw_request_info *info,
>         rvalue |= mgt_get_request(priv, DOT11_OID_DEFKEYID, 0, NULL, &r);
>         devindex = r.u;
>         /* Now get the key, return it */
>-       if (index == -1 || index > 3)
>+       if (!index || index > 3)
>                 /* no index provided, use the current one */
>                 index = devindex;
>         rvalue |= mgt_get_request(priv, DOT11_OID_DEFKEYX, index, NULL, &r);

This does not look right to me. Should this not be -
  if (!index || index > 4)
    ....
  else
   index -= 1;
(Or alternatively pass index -1 to mgt_get_request)

Also 5 lines further on we have -
         /* return the used key index */
         dwrq->flags |= devindex + 1;
which looks suspect.

Roger While 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ