[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080427010039.GB12370@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 22:00:39 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, zdenek.kabelac@...il.com,
rjw@...k.pl, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
penberg@...helsinki.fi, clameter@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pageexec@...email.hu,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>, systemtap@...rces.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: fix text_poke
Em Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 04:38:32PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge escreveu:
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> You do, when you decide to stop tracing. He is not talking about the old
>> function, that one, indeed will always be there, but what about the new
>> one? When tracing stops we want to remove it and revert to using the old
>> one...
>>
>> But perhaps you are suggesting that the new one, once loaded, stays
>> there forever, that would work, but after several tracing sessions one
>> would have to eventually reboot the machine due to many modules left
>> loaded.
>
> As I said, it doesn't seem like a very satisfactory way to solve the
> problem.
Indeed :-)
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists