| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4814AAD7.9010306@larces.uece.br> Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:33:27 -0300 From: Sergio Luis <sergio@...ces.uece.br> To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com> CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: 2.6.25 slow boot/reboot Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Sergio Luis <sergio@...ces.uece.br> wrote: >> This weekend I got some time and decided to try out 2.6.25, but its booting process was _really_ slow in my laptop[1]. With 'old' 2.6.24.5 my machine would take about 48 secs until it gave me the login prompt. And it would take about 22 seconds to reboot. > > Do you use LILO or GRUB for booting ? 2.6.25 works OK on the systems I > tested, but LILO really needs a lot of time to load the 2.6.25 kernel. > GRUB loads the 2.6.25 kernel at normal speed. I use LILO, but read your answer and tested GRUB, and you are right, GRUB starts the boot process much faster than LILO, but I was talking about the time it takes once the kernel is booting already. Isn't that independent from the bootloader used? I experience the same problems when I use GRUB. For instance, I see "Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 4 ports, IRQ sharing enabled" and the system seems to freeze for a while. It takes about 90 seconds for the next message (floppy0: no floppy controllers found) to show up. -sergio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists