[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804271002360.2896@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Sun, 27 Apr 2008 10:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
cc:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	linux arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] prepare kconfig inline optimization for all
 architectures
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 
> My opinion on this is still:
> "OPTIMIZE" means "work around bugs in the kernel".
No.
It means that
 - gcc used to (long ago) always honor "inline", and we had kernel code 
   that depended on that in various ways (ie required that there was no 
   return etc).
   We've been mostly replacing the ones we know about with 
   "__always_inline", but there may be some that remain. We'll find out, I 
   guess.
 - gcc was a total and utter piece of horrible crap in the inlining 
   department, doign insane things and changing their documentation to 
   match the new behaviour (and some people then claimed that it was 
   always documented that way).
   It would not inline big functions even when they statically collapsed 
   to nothing, etc.
As a result, we really couldn't afford to let gcc make any inlining 
decisions, because the compiler was simply *broken*.
			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
