linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] eventfd, signalfd, timerfd, epoll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48150BDA.5070903@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:27:22 -0700
From:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
To:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eventfd, signalfd, timerfd, epoll_create w/flags

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Davide Libenzi wrote:

> Ok, I asked this myself for about ten minutes, than I gave up. But why 
> sys_epoll_createp() instead of sys_epoll_create2()? There MUST be a reason 
> to deviate from the standard of all the other ones...

I used the number at the end for syscalls which aren't visible at
userlevel.  There they are useful indicating the number of arguments.
At userlevel I personally find it less than optimal but I'd have no
problem changing it to epoll_create2.

- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIFQva2ijCOnn/RHQRApYwAKCL4Ff6tZv+VyeuIMN6NHV1cCBhIACgvQRJ
YoZSN1dRdmarRhU0DzG0dbY=
=0nln
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/