linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] prepare kconfig inline optimization for all architectures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804271634490.3119@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
	linux arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] prepare kconfig inline optimization for all
 architectures



On Sun, 27 Apr 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> (actually, other than some obscure commandline options, the only sane way to
> avoid gcc doing this too agressive is using -Os)

Well, CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE has been defaulting to 'y' for a *loong* time, 
but it's hidden behind a EXPERIMENTAL (unless you were on some embedded 
architectures), so many people won't see it.

Perhaps it is time to remove the EXPERIMENTAL? I think the gcc warnings 
were mostly bogus - it's not as if there haven't been compiler bugs 
without -Os too..

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/