| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:46:30 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@....com>, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org Subject: Re: [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, bootmem/sparsemem * Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de> wrote: > > mm: allow reserve_bootmem() cross nodes > > I find it sad that this goes in now. I wrote a clean version of > reserve_bootmem() [1] and it was rejected with arguments that I did > not understand [2] and that were not further explained even though I > asked for it [3]. > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/16/76 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/16/234 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/16/250 oh, i had your patches applied then undid them due to this: http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0804.2/0253.html havent seen a followup to that mail so it was 'issue pending'. so i very much agree that your changes are cleaner, i just wanted to have one that has all the fixes included. Would you like to post a patch against current -git or should i extract the cleaner reserve_bootmem() from your previous patch? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists