[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080427234630.GC14338@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:46:30 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@....com>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, bootmem/sparsemem
* Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de> wrote:
> > mm: allow reserve_bootmem() cross nodes
>
> I find it sad that this goes in now. I wrote a clean version of
> reserve_bootmem() [1] and it was rejected with arguments that I did
> not understand [2] and that were not further explained even though I
> asked for it [3].
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/16/76
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/16/234
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/16/250
oh, i had your patches applied then undid them due to this:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0804.2/0253.html
havent seen a followup to that mail so it was 'issue pending'.
so i very much agree that your changes are cleaner, i just wanted to
have one that has all the fixes included.
Would you like to post a patch against current -git or should i extract
the cleaner reserve_bootmem() from your previous patch?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists