| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200804280157.12736.vda.linux@googlemail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:57:12 +0200 From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com> To: David Chinner <dgc@....com> Cc: xfs@....sgi.com, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc() On Monday 28 April 2008 01:40, David Chinner wrote: > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 04:51:02PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > Hi David, > > > > This patch reduces xfs_bmap_btalloc() stack usage by 50 bytes > > by moving part of its body into a helper function. > > Can you please attach your patches inline, Denys (see > Documentation/SubmittingPatches)? I can, but Kmail is notorious for mangling them :( Is it ok if I will paste them inline AND attach them too, so that you get guaranteed-nonmangled one in attachment? > I have a set of patches that introduces new functionality into the > allocator (dynamic allocation policies) that reduces > xfs_bmap_btalloc() function by 36 bytes (just by chance, I didn't > design it for this purpose). It breaks it down on functional > boundaries like Christoph's patch. I'm going to revist that patch > w.r.t both these patches and see what falls out the bottom... Nice to know that. Can you point me to svn/CVS/git/whatever which holds latest xfs devel tree? -- vda -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists