[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080426.230807.144232984.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 23:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mingo@...e.hu
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:59:43 +0200
> ... as i saw no reason why this feature, which i found rather useful,
> should be delayed another year or so. I'd be more than happy to promote
> this feature back to lib/Kconfig.debug, sparc64 interest would make that
> a strong argument.
So you caved in to FUD in order to pad your commit and signoff count?
Because anyone who is paying attention can see clearly that you're
trying to push as much stuff as quickly as possible into Linus's tree
with your singoffs and authorship on it this merge window.
Gee, I wonder why...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists