[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080428063953.GA2088@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:39:54 +0300
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kconfig 'depend' vs. 'select'
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 05:45:36PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> I'm trying to stir up interest in solving a problem that seems to pop
> up frequently. :)
>
> The short story is:
>
> 1) If you say your driver "depend"s on a subsystem providing a set of
> interfaces you need, this doesn't work properly if your driver is
> marked built-in and that subsystem you need is modular for some
> reason.
>...
This should work.
Can you give an example of the problem you are thinking of?
> So if you had, for example:
>
> config FOO_API
> ...
>
> and then you had two drivers:
>
> config DRIVER1
> tristate ...
> needs FOO_API
>
> config DRIVER2
> tristate ...
> needs FOO_API
>
> and DRIVER1 was built modular but DRIVER2 was built-in,
> the Kconfig system would make sure FOO_API were built-in.
>
> The "needs" name and syntax is just something arbitrary I came up
> with, don't take it too seriously :-)
What about "select"?
That's exactly what it's doing.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists