linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080428081129.GC4507@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:11:29 +0200
From:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code

Subject: [PATCH] sched: fix locking in arch_reinit_sched_domains

From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>

Concurrent calls to detach_destroy_domains and arch_init_sched_domains
were prevented by the old scheduler subsystem cpu hotplug mutex. When
this got converted to get_online_cpus() the locking got broken.
Unlike before now several processes can concurrently enter the critical
sections that were protected by the old lock.

So use the already present doms_cur_mutex to protect these sections again.

Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
---
 kernel/sched.c |   24 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -311,6 +311,16 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(task_group_lock);
 /* doms_cur_mutex serializes access to doms_cur[] array */
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(doms_cur_mutex);
 
+static inline void lock_doms_cur(void)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&doms_cur_mutex);
+}
+
+static inline void unlock_doms_cur(void)
+{
+	mutex_unlock(&doms_cur_mutex);
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
 #ifdef CONFIG_USER_SCHED
 # define INIT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD	(2*NICE_0_LOAD)
@@ -358,21 +368,9 @@ static inline void set_task_rq(struct ta
 #endif
 }
 
-static inline void lock_doms_cur(void)
-{
-	mutex_lock(&doms_cur_mutex);
-}
-
-static inline void unlock_doms_cur(void)
-{
-	mutex_unlock(&doms_cur_mutex);
-}
-
 #else
 
 static inline void set_task_rq(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu) { }
-static inline void lock_doms_cur(void) { }
-static inline void unlock_doms_cur(void) { }
 
 #endif	/* CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED */
 
@@ -7813,8 +7811,10 @@ int arch_reinit_sched_domains(void)
 	int err;
 
 	get_online_cpus();
+	lock_doms_cur();
 	detach_destroy_domains(&cpu_online_map);
 	err = arch_init_sched_domains(&cpu_online_map);
+	unlock_doms_cur();
 	put_online_cpus();
 
 	return err;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/