linux-kernel - Re: [patch] x86, voyager: fix ioremap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080428100154.0ac65cb6@core>
Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:01:54 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, voyager: fix ioremap_nocache()

> You can post whatever patches you like a million times to lkml.
> That's not the problem.
> 
> It's that the patches don't get reviewed, posting them more or to a
> different place doesn't help that.

So review them. Your comments strike me as the pot calling the kettle
black given the way the network people like to live on their own mailing
list.

Sorting x86 arch code is inevitably going to break a few eggs, but I
suspect the time cost has been more in Dave v Ingo (12 rounds, two falls,
two submissions or a knockout) than actually sorting out the fallout of a
couple of problem cases.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/