linux-kernel - Re: [2.6.25-stable PATCH] regression: powertop says 120K wakeups/sec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200804281209.47927.danielklaffenbach@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:09:47 +0200
From:	Daniel Klaffenbach <danielklaffenbach@...il.com>
To:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com
Subject: Re: [2.6.25-stable PATCH] regression: powertop says 120K wakeups/sec

> commit 0fda6b403f0eca66ad8a7c946b3996e359100443
>
> Patch to fix huge number of wakeups reported due to recent changes in
> processor_idle.c. The problem was that the entry_method determination was
> broken due to one of the recent commits (bc71bec91f987) causing
> C1 entry to not to go to halt.
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/22/124
>
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
OK, this fixes my issue with the massive amount of wakeups:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/24/70

However the CPU does not really go to C1 or C2 after applying this patch to 
the latest git kernel:

Cn                Avg residency       P-states (frequencies)
C0 (cpu running)        (99,4%)         1,80 Ghz     0,0%
C1                0,0ms ( 0,0%)         1,60 Ghz     0,0%
C2                0,0ms ( 0,6%)          800 Mhz   100,0%

- Daniel

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)