[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200804280955.53592.jesse.barnes@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:55:53 -0700
From: Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@...el.com>
To: Mika Fischer <mika.fischer@...pnet.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, balajirrao@...il.com,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_32: trim memory by updating e820 v3
On Monday, April 28, 2008 9:31 am Mika Fischer wrote:
> Jesse Barnes schrieb:
> > On Monday, April 28, 2008 6:53 am Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> i think we should still try to make this a non-default option because
> >> modern Xorg should not have any need to touch MTRRs. Perhaps a .config
> >> dependent on CONFIG_DANGEROUS ;-)
> >
> > Well, not quite... we're still waiting on some way of getting WC
> > semantics for sysfs PCI files. Suresh tells me something like that is
> > queued up, but until that hits the mainline X will still need to bang the
> > MTRRs to get decent performance.
>
> Do you happen to know if this new sysfs-way will work correctly in the
> case where the MTRRs explicitly say that the video-memory is uncachable?
It should, since we'll be using PAT to set the cache control in the sysfs
case.
Jesse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists