[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48160199.4070201@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:55:53 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, voyager: fix ioremap_nocache()
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 01:18:09AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> ... but the PAT patchset was all around lkml. The ioremap change was
>> trivial, went into v2.6.25 and was discussed on lkml:
>>
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/25/287
>
> lkml is a hell-hole with a signal/noise ratio worse than slashdot. Any
> chance you could create a linux-x86 list for x86 specific changes so
> that a focussed review and discussion can happen?
We have been talking about it between us. Originally, Ingo was opposed
to it exactly *because* he wanted to keep the development as open as
possible. After the merge window craziness is over, we may want to
revisit this.
I'm not saying we're doing everything right at the moment; heck, we're
still figuring out how to work this on three people. However, I want to
set the record straight - Ingo *especially* has been concerned to keep
development open from the very beginning.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists