linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched fixes for suboptimal balancing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080428185515.GF4491@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:55:16 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
Cc:	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched fixes for suboptimal balancing


* Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
> 
> Here are my proposed fixes for the issue Dmitry has highlighted in:
> 
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/22/296
> 
> This is an RFC, and it applies to sched-devel.

thanks Gregory - picked them up for more testing.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/