linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86_32: trim memory by updating e820 v3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86802c440804281206u6b5086a3h42192b7d36b08325@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:06:26 -0700
From:	"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To:	"Gabriel C" <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>
Cc:	"Mika Fischer" <mika.fischer@...pnet.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Jesse Barnes" <jesse.barnes@...el.com>, balajirrao@...il.com,
	"Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_32: trim memory by updating e820 v3

On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com> wrote:
> Mika Fischer wrote:
>  > Hi Ingo,
>  >
>  > I'm having the same problem.
>  >
>  > Ingo Molnar schrieb:
>  >> excellent. So just to make sure: this box never had proper graphics
>  >> under Linux (under no previous kernel), due to the way the BIOS has set
>  >> up the MTRR's, right?
>  >
>  > Well, not quite. X still works fine, but since the video memory is
>  > overlapped by two of the existing MTRRs, X cannot add a write-combining
>  > range for the video memory. That makes X rather slow especially if you
>  > use DRI for Compiz etc.
>
>  Well you are lucky then :)
>
>  Yeah X 'worked' but it worked as slow as with vesa video driver here.

[    0.000000] rangeX: 0000000000000000 - 00000000d0000000
[    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 0, base: 0MB, range: 2048MB, type WB
[    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 1, base: 2048MB, range: 1024MB, type WB
[    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 2, base: 3072MB, range: 256MB, type WB
[    0.000000] range0: 00000000cf800000 - 00000000cf800000
[    0.000000] range: 00000000cf800000 - 00000000d0000000
[    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 3, base: 3320MB, range: 8MB, type WB
[    0.000000] range0: 0000000100000000 - 0000000120000000
[    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 4, base: 4096MB, range: 512MB, type WB
[    0.000000] range: 0000000120000000 - 0000000130000000
[    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 5, base: 4608MB, range: 256MB, type WB
[    0.000000] hole: 000000012c000000 - 0000000130000000
[    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 6, base: 4800MB, range: 64MB, type UC

so your X server need two entries for WB?

can you send out /proc/mtrr with booting with disable_mtrr_cleanup?

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/