linux-kernel - Re: [patch] video: fix SOC_CAMERA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:17:04 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] video: fix SOC_CAMERA_MT9M001 build bug

On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> 
> * Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de> wrote:
> 
> > > as you can see it from the build log above, the compiler disagrees 
> > > with you on whether the driver depends on I2C. I'm just the 
> > > messenger :)
> > 
> > Very sorry, but I don't see it. What I see above, is that mt9m001 and 
> > mt9v022 cannot be compiled - as I said, _they_ need i2c. And I don't 
> > see a single line for soc_camera.c. SOC_CAMERA is a generic API, it 
> > shouldn't have any hardware dependencies at all. Whereas mt9v022 and 
> > mt9m001 are 2 specific i2c cameras.
> 
> sorry, you are right. Mind doing the right patch as you know this code 
> much better than i do?

Ok, will do, although, the fix is just to duplicate your patch and move it 
from under SOC_CAMERA to MT9V022 and MT9M001. Thanks for reporting.

Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/