[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080428044854.GA5437@in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:18:54 +0530
From: "K. Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
Cc: prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, dwilder@...ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
hunt@...hat.com, dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 1/1] debugfs_printk and debugfs_dump interface
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:50:51AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 13:49 +0530, K. Prasad wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 01:12:00PM +0530, K. Prasad wrote:
> > > Please find the new patch below.
> > > >
> > Let the email slip through a little early. Please find the revised
> > patch below.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > K.Prasad
> >
> > This patch introduces two new interfaces called debugfs_printk and
> > debugfs_dump which can be used to print to the debugfs mount directly.
> > It uses the 'trace' infrastructure underneath and is a patch over it.
> > A sample file is also created to demonstrate its ease of use.
>
> I still think debugfs_printk() is not the right name, as it is not part
> of the existing family of debugfs_* routines.
Whether to call it trace_printk() and trace_dump() is a suggestion I
would like to ask David Wilder (and others). Let me know if you think
there are better names.
Thanks,
K.Prasad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists