[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200804281507.38309.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:07:37 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
To: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Adam Belay <ambx1@....rr.com>,
Adam M Belay <abelay@....edu>,
Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Matthieu Castet <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 50/54] ISAPNP: fold isapnp_read_resources() back into isapnp_get_resources()
On Saturday 26 April 2008 05:07:23 pm Rene Herman wrote:
> On 25-04-08 20:38, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> > + for (i = 0; i < ISAPNP_MAX_MEM; i++) {
> > + ret = isapnp_read_word(ISAPNP_CFG_MEM + (i << 3)) << 8;
> > + if (!ret)
> > + continue;
> > + pnp_res = pnp_add_mem_resource(dev, ret, ret, 0);
> > + if (pnp_res)
> > + pnp_res->index = i;
> > + }
> > + for (i = 0; i < ISAPNP_MAX_IRQ; i++) {
> > + ret = (isapnp_read_word(ISAPNP_CFG_IRQ + (i << 1)) >>
> > + 8);
>
> Truly trivial, but if you kill the useless outer (), it fits on one line...
Fixed. I also removed the negation, e.g., we have
if (ret) {
pnp_res = ...
}
rather than
if (!ret)
continue;
pnp_res = ...
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists