linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080428055629.GB3192@infradead.org>
Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:56:29 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Nathan Scott <nscott@...nex.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
	David Chinner <dgc@....com>, xfs@....sgi.com,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc()

On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:06:51AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> Having to compile chunks of XFS code in both kernel and
> userspace is also wierd (relative to other drivers), and
> its a side-effect of needing to do that (all the code
> dealing with specifics of ondisk format is shared).

There would be neater ways to deal with that, but then again there
are more urgent things to tackle.  And for the time beeing using
STATIC to imply non-inline is actually a very useful hack for XFS.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/