linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86_32: trim memory by updating e820 v3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86802c440804281616t6a62cb74h430b4ca598d101bc@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:16:26 -0700
From:	"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	"Gabriel C" <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>,
	"Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Jesse Barnes" <jesse.barnes@...el.com>,
	"Mika Fischer" <mika.fischer@...pnet.de>, balajirrao@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_32: trim memory by updating e820 v3

On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
> "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> writes:
>
>  > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 5:56 AM, Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > another continuous MTRR mapping.
>  >
>  > several months ago, we were talking about modifying MTRR. but Eric
>  > said that is not safe because acpi and smi...
>
>  I think it was Andi who spotted that originally, and yes I do think it
>  is a pretty horrific failure mode.  Reprogramming the MTRRs requires
>  full knowledge of the hardware and what is going on that we don't
>  always have.  PAT support has just been merged, and using that only
>  requires knowledge about the region whose attributes we intend to change.
>
>  So lets concentrate on PAT to solve contiguous MTRR region problems.
>
>  We can upgrade UC to WC with pat.  As well as demote WB to UC or WC.
>  So for those regions we know about we should be in good shape.
>
>  In a slightly related vein.  Trimming the memory we consider usable by
>  looking at MTRRs and if a region is not WB not considering it RAM
>  sounds like a very reasonable work around for one class of BIOS bugs.

yeah, i will look at to loop the ram region array instead of checking
highest_pfn only...


YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/