linux-kernel - Re: patch usb-mos7840-test-and-propagate-set_uart_reg-return-value.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080429065133.GA8708@suse.de>
Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:51:33 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	SL Baur <steve@...acs.org>
Cc:	12o3l@...cali.nl, greg@...ah.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: patch
	usb-mos7840-test-and-propagate-set_uart_reg-return-value.patch
	added to gregkh-2.6 tree

On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:31:07PM -0700, SL Baur wrote:
> On 4/28/08, gregkh@...e.de <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> >
> >  This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
> >
> >      Subject: USB: mos7840: test and propagate set_uart_reg return value
> >
> >  to my gregkh-2.6 tree.  Its filename is
> >
> >      usb-mos7840-test-and-propagate-set_uart_reg-return-value.patch
> 
> NAK.  Reviewer's question was never answered.

Does that mean that the original patch is invalid?  Or just that your
question was never answered?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/