[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4816CBA1.4050907@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:17:53 +0100
From: Richard <tuxbox.guru@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Adam Belay <ambx1@....rr.com>, Adam M Belay <abelay@....edu>,
Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Matthieu Castet <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25 pci=noacpi
Hi Andrew/all
A stock standard 2.6.24 kernel worked fine, but it exhibited a problem
where the timer sources didnt run as expected. ( I didnt put too much
effort in to it as I wanted a hot off the press kernel ) in 2.6.24 the
ACPI done its job :-)
I am going to enable netconsole to try see if it can throw me a bone.
Thanks,
Richard
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:53:57 +0100 Richard <tuxbox.guru@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Using an AMD Sempron notebook (HP Compaq 6715b) single processor
>> machine, It shuts down during bootup when ACPI is fully enabled. I
>> added pci=noacpi to the cmdline and it finally boots, but its extremely
>> slow... (kdm times out with error saying it took too long to load and
>> disables graphical)
>>
>> Dmesg doest show anything out of the ordinary, irq_stats only shows the
>> timer interrupts being incremented. (noirq also works, but same
>> behaviour) Can someone please offer me some pointers so I can fault find
>> this problem.
>>
>>
>
> Did any earlier kernels work OK? If so, which versions?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists