linux-kernel - Re: rtc_valid_tm doesn't check tm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200804290340.16642.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date:	Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:40:16 -0700
From:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To:	Uwe Kleine-König <Uwe.Kleine-Koenig@...i.com>
Cc:	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rtc_valid_tm doesn't check tm_wday

On Monday 28 April 2008, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm currently writing an rtc driver and want to use rtc_valid_tm to
> assert to have a valid date before writing it to the rtc.
> 
> Now I wonder why rtc_valid_tm doesn't check tm_wday for being in the
> range [0 .. 6].  Is there a reason?

As far as I know, the kernel doesn't use tm_wday, tm_yday, or
tm_isdst ... so none of those fields are expected to be valid.
See the rtc(4) manpage.

- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/