[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080429142819.GF26461@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:28:19 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
Cc: Sergio Luis <sergio@...ces.uece.br>,
Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop@...world.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25 slow boot/reboot
* Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com> wrote:
> [ 1.375711] Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 4 ports, IRQ
> sharing enabled
> [ 4.399907] floppy0: no floppy controllers found
>
> a 90-second delay is not what's happening, or at least, not what the
> kernel is seeing. So my bet would be something clock-related. Probably
> the system's clocksource is not running the time correctly, which is
> causing system events to be delayed. I fail to see, however, how does
> the patch you bisected to influences this. Ingo, do you have any idea?
the first thing to check, does latest x86.git work fine:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/x86.git/README
? We've got fixes queued up - in particular one could result in 'slow'
systems by virtue of denying an ioremap():
Subject: revert: "x86: ioremap(), extend check to all RAM pages"
maybe the bisection went haywire.
Or the secondary core booted up in such a sucky way that it causes such
massive slowdowns? Perhaps we are flooding the system with local APIC
timer interrupts or other interrupts?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists