[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080429152607.GA40409@dspnet.fr.eu.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:26:07 +0200
From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: alan@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] isicom: Fix buffer allocation
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 02:17:33PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Fix the rather strange buffer management on open that turned up while
> auditing for BKL dependancies
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
>
> diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude linux.vanilla-2.6.25-mm1/drivers/char/isicom.c linux-2.6.25-mm1/drivers/char/isicom.c
> --- linux.vanilla-2.6.25-mm1/drivers/char/isicom.c 2008-04-28 11:36:48.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.25-mm1/drivers/char/isicom.c 2008-04-14 10:56:25.000000000 +0100
> @@ -813,15 +813,13 @@
> return 0;
> if (!port->xmit_buf) {
> /* Relies on BKL */
> + unsigned long page = get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (page == 0)
> return -ENOMEM;
> + if (port->xmit_buf)
> + free_page(page);
> + else
> + port->xmit_buf = (unsigned char *) page;
> }
Still looks rather strange. An if(x) inside an if(!x) ?
OG.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists