[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080429115424.41b82fcb.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:54:24 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Nadia.Derbey@...l.net
Cc: manfred@...orfullife.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, efault@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Scalability requirements for sysv ipc - v2
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:33:04 +0200
Nadia.Derbey@...l.net wrote:
> After scalability problems had been detected when using the sysV ipcs, I
> have proposed to use an RCU based implementation of the IDR api instead
> (see thread http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/11/212).
>
> Resending the patch series after
> . integrating Paul's remarks
> . fixing a bug I had introduced
> . porting it to 2.6.25-mm1.
>
> Reviewers are still welcome!
>
> Patch 1 can be taken alone: it fixes a problem in the existing IDR API.
>
> Patches should be applied on linux-2.6.25-mm1, in the following order:
>
> [ PATCH 01/10 ] : idr_minor_fix.patch
> [ PATCH 02/10 ] : ridr_structure.patch
> [ PATCH 03/10 ] : ridr_pre_get.patch
> [ PATCH 04/10 ] : ridr_init.patch
> [ PATCH 05/10 ] : ridr_get_new_above.patch
> [ PATCH 06/10 ] : ridr_get_new.patch
> [ PATCH 07/10 ] : ridr_find.patch
> [ PATCH 08/10 ] : ridr_remove.patch
> [ PATCH 09/10 ] : ipc_use_ridr.patch
> [ PATCH 10/10 ] : remove_ipc_lock_down.patch
>
hm, you've been busy.
As all this work is entirely for performance reasons, the changelog should
have (lots of) performance testing results! Please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists