[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804291200140.2997@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...nel.org, Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [27/37] tehuti: move ioctl perm check closer to function start
(CVE-2008-1675)
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Greg KH wrote:
>
> Hm, that's the way it is in Linus's tree, we should change it there
> first.
Done. It will be commit 6203554207728f43cfb9fd48585cd6500da73d42 when I
push out (but please point to the original commit that actually adds the
check: 6203554 just changes from CAP_NET_ADMIN to CAP_SYS_RAWIO and is not
as important as adding the check in the first place.
(I don't know of anybody who actually really uses capabilities with
individual bits, so I seriously doubt it matters)
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists