[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080429140926.bb763630.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:09:26 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
Cc: rdunlap@...otime.net, rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk, bunk@...nel.org,
den@...nvz.org, linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org,
adobriyan@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pcmcia_ioctl.c compile error
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:03:07 -0700
Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 13:59 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:17:04 +0100 Russell King wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 09:27:10PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > Commit 9c37066d888bf6e1b96ad12304971b3ddeabbad0 (proc: remove proc_bus)
> > > > came through -mm that contains a patch implementing the overdue removal
> > > > of the PCMCIA control ioctl that did not yet make it into Linus' tree:
> > >
> > > Okay, this means at least one of my platforms is now dead as far as
> > > building new kernels for it, and nothing I can do about that. Ho hum.
> >
> > I don't get it. Several of us had building problems for a few
> > days with some pasic driver. We posted some bug reports and
> > some patches, but we put up with it for a few days...
> >
>
> I believe Russell is referring to the removal of the ioctl, not the
> compile breakage.
>
That would be interesting information (although I have a vague feeling that
it has been discussed before).
I've been sitting on pcmcia-delete-obsolete-pcmcia_ioctl-feature.patch for
over a year, mainly waiting for Dominik to reappear and decide what to do
about it.
I could just drop it, shrug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists